Kodak Balanced Scorecard

Kodak Balanced Scorecard

Fully Editable

Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets

Professional Design

Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates

Pre-Built

For Quick And Efficient Use

No Expertise Is Needed

Easy To Follow

Kodak Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
Icon

Unlock the Full Balanced Scorecard for Deeper Strategic Insight

This Kodak Balanced Scorecard Analysis helps you assess the company across financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth priorities in one structured format. This page already shows a real preview of the actual report content, so you can review the style before buying. Purchase the full version to get the complete ready-to-use analysis.

Benefits

Icon

Portfolio Balance

Portfolio Balance matters because Kodak can manage commercial print and advanced materials & chemicals as one portfolio, not as separate bets. In 2025, that mattered for a company with about $1.1 billion in annual revenue, where print still drove most cash while materials kept the mix from depending on one market. It gives leaders one view of growth, cash generation, and execution quality across very different customer and factory models.

Icon

Recurring Sales Focus

Kodak's balanced scorecard should track consumables, software, and service revenue from its installed base, since these lines recur after equipment sales. That gives management earlier visibility into margin stability than one-off press or plate orders. In 2024, Kodak reported net sales of about $1.0 billion, so even a small lift in recurring mix can matter.

Explore a Preview
Icon

Customer Reliability

Customer Reliability in Kodak's Balanced Scorecard should track uptime, response speed, and defect rates across packaging, publishing, and visual communications. A 99.9% uptime target still allows 8.76 hours of downtime a year, so even small outages can halt customer production fast. On a 1 million-unit run, a 1% defect rate creates 10,000 rejects, which makes product consistency a direct revenue and trust issue.

Icon

Shop Floor Discipline

Shop Floor Discipline fits Kodak's manufacturing base because yield, scrap, throughput, and on-time delivery are the right controls for presses, coatings, and materials output. Tighter process control lowers waste and rework, so Kodak can protect margins in digital printing and industrial materials while keeping schedules reliable. That also builds customer trust, since consistent quality matters more when products move through high-volume, technical production lines.

Icon

Innovation Tracking

Innovation tracking helps Kodak tie product work to clear gates like launch timing, adoption rates, and pilot-to-commercial conversion. That lets management see if new software, print solutions, or materials are moving from lab tests to customer revenue, not just R&D spend. In Kodak's 2025 fiscal-year scorecard, this kind of tracking should make it easier to compare project speed, conversion, and early demand across the portfolio.

Icon

Kodak's Balanced Scorecard Sharpens Cash, Margin, and Growth

For Kodak, a balanced scorecard helps turn FY2025 revenue of about $1.1 billion into cleaner control of cash, margin, and execution. It can track recurring consumables and service sales, uptime, and scrap, so leaders spot risk earlier and protect the core print business while funding materials growth.

FY2025 focus Benefit
Recurring revenue More stable cash flow

What is included in the product

Word Icon Detailed Word Document
Analyzes Kodak's strategic performance across financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth priorities
Plus Icon
Excel Icon Editable Excel File
Helps quickly pinpoint Kodak's strategic gaps across financial, customer, process, and learning areas for faster decision-making.

Drawbacks

Icon

Metric Overload

In FY2025, Kodak's print, software, consumables, and chemicals mix can push a scorecard into KPI overload fast. A team tracking just 8 metrics across 4 lines already faces 32 measures, so more time goes into reporting than fixing margins, cash flow, or service issues.

That matters because Kodak's 2025 results still depend on tight execution across several moving parts, not one simple business. If the scorecard gets crowded, managers can miss the few metrics that matter most, like revenue mix, working capital, and operating profit.

Icon

Lagging Visibility

Kodak's lagging financial measures can miss a demand turn until after the fact, which matters when packaging, publishing, and industrial orders can swing within a month. In 2025, that delay can leave managers reacting to revenue and margin changes that are already old news. A metric set that only updates monthly can hide a fast 10% order drop or rebound until the next close.

That weakens control and makes inventory, pricing, and plant schedules slower to adjust.

Explore a Preview
Icon

Different Cycles

Kodak's commercial print work moves in weeks, while advanced materials and plant changes can run for quarters, so one scorecard can blur fast service fixes with slow capital choices. That matters because a single metric set may reward a short-term print win even when a new material line still needs 6-18 months to qualify. The result is weaker readout on 2025 execution, since the same KPI cannot fairly track both daily uptime and long-cycle R&D or plant ramp risk.

Icon

Data Gaps

Kodak's global mix of plants, sales teams, and product lines can scatter KPIs across systems, so Balanced Scorecard inputs may not line up cleanly. When data quality varies by site or business unit, the scorecard can send weak signals and make comparisons unreliable. That matters in 2025 because a small reporting error can distort trend reads on cash, margin, and service performance.

Icon

Trade-Off Pressure

Kodak faces real trade-off pressure: margin, speed, and innovation do not all improve together. In FY2025, any push for lower cost can slow delivery, while faster launches and heavier new-product spending can squeeze operating profit, so Kodak has to pick what matters most in each cycle.

This makes the Balanced Scorecard harder to manage because gains in one area can hurt another.

Icon

Kodak's 2025 Scorecard: Too Many Metrics, Too Little Signal

Kodak's 2025 Balanced Scorecard can get bloated fast: 8 metrics across 4 lines means 32 checks, while monthly lagging KPIs can miss a 10% order swing. Data gaps across plants and units also weaken cash, margin, and service reads.

Drawback 2025 impact
KPI overload 32 measures
Slow signal 10% swing can be missed

Get Your Copy
Kodak Reference Sources

This preview shows the exact Kodak Balanced Scorecard Analysis document you'll receive after purchase. It's not a placeholder or sample – what you see here is pulled directly from the final file. Once you complete checkout, the full detailed version becomes available immediately.

Explore a Preview

Frequently Asked Questions

It measures whether Kodak is turning its 2 core businesses into reliable customer, process, and cash results. The most useful indicators are on-time delivery, defect rates, recurring consumables sales, and operating cash conversion, because they connect commercial print and advanced materials to performance. A tight scorecard usually works best with 8 to 12 KPIs across the 4 perspectives.

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site - including articles or product references - constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.